Global Warming News & Inconsistency
A global warming scaremonger scientist converts to skepticism after a colleague finds an error in an 80 year old equation, whilst other scientists turn up their nose and with the completely unscientific comment that
Reto Ruedy of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies says greenhouse theory is "200 year old science" and doubts the possibility of dramatic changes to the basic theory.Science should never be beyond question, it only faith that makes such comments. Especially considering how uncertain most of climate science really is.
In other thoughts, man made global warming skeptics and global warming has been said to be worse than nazi's and the holocaust. Hansen, probably the most prominent scientist in the global warming debate said that
If we cannot stop the building of more coal-fired power plants, those coal trains will be death trains -- no less gruesome than if they were boxcars headed to crematoria, loaded with uncountable irreplaceable species.So more coal-fired power plants is the same as death trains...then why aren't we invading China to stop them from committing this great moral evil. China is creating more coal-fired power plants every year than the rest of the world combined. If this is such a great evil, why are we not stopping it? After all, it is supposedly affecting all of us, and thus our own people will be on those trains....Why is our focus on the western world crippling itself, when this will surely mean that China will be able to kill us all with CO2 with impunity?
We've heard people say that a democratic government is not enough to stop climate change problems, and that our government should take drastic action to reduce carbon emissions by up to 90% or even 100% due to the dire moral nature of the destruction that will be wrought. Yet not one of these prophets of global warming doom has mentioned how they intend to stop other sovereign nature from killing us all with global warming CO2 emissions...