Missing Link or Missing Brain
Some important questions.
How do they know it is 'transitional'?
How is the Archaeoptryx 'Transitional' when fully formed birds are found in older strata?
How is this a blow to anything intelligent design (ID) has said?
How many creatures alive are more similar to this 'Ancient missing link? Is this just another coelocanth?
How can they say this fossil shows "the evolution of animals from living in water to living on land happened gradually, with fish first living in shallow water." How do they know it lived in shallow water?
I can't wait to see the pictures of the fossil.
Update: Scientific American has a photo of the fossil. I'll put up another post once more solid info is out.